Subject  |    | | Modified  |
|---|
| | When PRINTING a Tax Roll Correction report my Correction Type & Legal Decription says #NAME? |
| | | |
| | Comments transferred from Parature:
12/13/2006 4:01 PM MDT Posted Comment Nora Priegel
This was approved for 04.14.00
11/7/2006 8:30 AM MDT Posted Comment Stan Owens
Lisa, This issue has been escalated to engineering and I am waiting for information on which build this will be assigned to.
|
| | | |
| | When printing a Tax Roll Report from the interface of RW, it prints and totals by Taxing Authority. My Treasurer is requesting total tax by Tax Dist. I also had a call today from Crook County with the same problem. This is probably a state wide issue for the Wyoming counties. This needs looked at and if possible fixed soon. |
| | | |
| | Comments transferred from Parature:
12/12/2006 11:00 AM MDT Posted Comment Nora Priegel
Lisa, I have been enlightened as to what this issue is about. First of all let me clarify that there is no work order from DOR on taxroll. It has been decided to use the vew table as we did last year. What we need to know now is whether you will be using the taxrollreports out... |
| | | |
| | When entering the occupancy as single family residential it auto defaults to abstract Single Family Residential -Manufactured Home(10102) - I would like this to default to Single Family Residence - Site Built. (10101) |
| | | |
| | For contractor and lender data entry the table maintenance security module for WY needs to be altered. I suggest that you create a new development ticket in Parature for WY and assign it to SME. If SME and DOR agree this is acceptable they can send a work order request up.
|
| | | |
| | Comments transferred from Parature:
12/1/2006 4:50 PM MDT Posted Comment Nora Priegel
This has been approved and tested for 04.13.02
10/25/2006 3:44 PM MDT Posted Comment Nora Priegel
That last note was meant for ticket 607-3300118.
The work order will be scheduled for this and when I know more I will let you know.
Nora
10/25/2006... |
| | | |
| | It is possible to enter a building at more than 100% complete, which could end up being a problem if someone, for instance, accidently types in an extra zero. |
| | | |
| | Comments transferred from Parature:
11/21/2006 1:55 PM MDT Pending Build Test Tiffany Cherry This has been approved for 4.15.00 8/29/2006 7:23 AM MDT Posted Comment Tiffany Cherry John,
We are working on getting this fixed. Below is a query you can run to see if you have any accounts with a percent complete greater then 100%.
SELECT tblAcct.ACCOUNTNO, tblImps.BLDGID,... |
| | | |
| | Details: When down payment information is added to the financing data, the program will automatically calculate the loan amount, assuming that there aren't any other financing elements involved in the sale. By the same token, loan amount information added will cause an automatic calculation of what the down payment must have been, when that need not necessarily have been the case at all.
Steps to...
|
| | | |
| | The current PP system does not allow the user to search by parcel number, only by the account number.
We would like to suggest an enhancement that makes the search features in PP mirror the search features used with real property. |
| | | |
| | Comments transferred from Parature:
10/26/2006 8:33 AM MDT Provided Info David Chapman
There are alien subcreatures crawing through the Oracle Enterprise Manager. Do you agree? 8/10/2006 9:52 AM MDT Provided Info David Chapman
What is the best way to get a response on enhancement requests such as this? If this is important to Wyoming counties, what do I need to... |
| | | |
| | We must have the ability to generate a printout showing the calculations that led to our appraised values. These are requested on a regular basis by our customers and are included in every CBOE packet. |
| | | |
| | Comments transferred from Parature:
12/12/2006 10:08 AM MDT Need More Info Reminder System Ran Alert Need More Info Reminder 12/9/2006 9:49 AM MDT Need More Info Reminder System Ran Alert Need More Info Reminder 12/6/2006 9:47 AM MDT Requested Info Cindy Stromberger Wanting to know if you received the work order for the above issue and if so if it... |
| | | |
| | I spoke with Laura regarding maintaining the free form section of the legal. We would like to be able to maintain the text the way you can if you are in a word document. We can't enter and start a new line of text without getting an error. |
| | | |
| | There are 2338 catigories in the tlkpppbusinesstype and they are assorted by business code#. Could you make it so it could be searched by typing in the letters of the businessdesc. At this point they are not alphabetical and it is very time consuming to scroll to find the right one through 2338 of them. Thank you for your consideration. |
| | | |
| | This summary should be more organized, consistent and easier for the taxpayer to read (especially ag land owners). First, the abstract codes should be listed in a consistent order. The ag code needs to be more descriptive, so the land owner knows how the land is classified. My suggestion is a numercial sequence for the abstract codes and a descriptive ag code (i.e. irrigated, dry farm, grazing).
|
| | | |
| | In Oil & Gas globally, anytime you make a change and recalc and save, after saving regardless of what tab you are in the screen auto defaults to account summary. It should stay in the screen that you are working in. Steps to Reproduce: Edited group #, recalc, save, transfered to acct summary, went back to well tab corrected api, recalc saved, transferred back to acct summary scrn. Edited... |
| | | |
| | On the personal property form there is no place for a return address or a place to identify what county is requesting the information.
Since we are building new report forms and with a number of us sending to the same businesses it would be helpful to know where to return it. |
| | | |
| | Comments transferred from Parature:
4/26/2006 2:50 PM MDT Provided Info Glenda Walsh
Could you provide us with an update on this ticket? Thank You. Glenda |
| | | |
| | I think that mezzanines should be open for a selection in the mezzanine field in all class and quality. |
|  | | |
| | When doing a search-unless you go into options each & every time & change the status to a & e-you only get active accounts in the results. We need exempts to always show up along with the actives. |
| | | |
| | The parcel number field in the imps screen is cutting off the last two digits of the parcel number field. |
| | | |
| | Add "Cert Code" to the Batch Land and Batch Imps process as a method of selecting records for the batch process.
The County is considering using this field to track when accounts need to rechecked/appraised. Currently, you can update Cert Code in Batch, but it's not an option for selecting accounts.
Also, can we add an options global field so the County can rename the label for this field... |
| | | |
| | Comments transferred from Parature"
10/9/2006 1:41 PM MDT Posted Comment Cindy Stromberger We are in the process of checking the status of all your tickets once I have that informaion I will contact you. |
| | | |
| | Example: R0003093 I would have thought that the reception number should be the number by which the summary screen should order sales. I mentioned this to Susan previously and I thought she said that that was true. If you look at the above parcel, you'll see that it is not working that way. The highest reception number, therefore, the newest doc, should be on top. But it is not. The recording date is... |
| | | |
| | Comments transferred from Parature:
9/14/2005 12:37 PM MDT Posted Comment Susan Dussaman Jeness, I changed this ticket to an enhancement and assigned it to Cindy South for consideration.
Thanks!
9/14/2005 10:52 AM MDT Provided Info Jeness Saxton Actually, yes I am asking for it to be changed. This is a racehorse state. Wyoming Statute found in 34-1-120 talks about... |
| | | |
| | Would like to see the land adj. factor (area in land valuation portion of system) an item that could be updated in batch. This would prevent alot of data entry and possibility for clerical errors. |
| | | |
| | Would like to see land dollar per be an attribute to select by in GEOWARE - good way to audit land values within a neighborhood without going out to GIS.
|
| | | |
| | Would like to see the gross acres/gross sf field in the new parcel list so it can be updated before a subdivision is created. Currently a user has to create then go into each new record and update that field. Would be much easier to have it in before creation of the subdivision. |
| | | |
| | Add parcel number to sales data entry area where you have to enter account # to enter sale - this way you wouldn't have to switch to account # on the summary screen to get the account# to enter the sale. We primarily work with GEO pins (do not have a county number)
|
| | | |
| | Comments transferred from Parature:
10/9/2006 1:39 PM MDT Posted Comment Cindy Stromberger we are in the process of checking the status on all your tickets once I have that information I will notify you 9/7/2005 2:56 PM MDT Provided Info Debbie Larson
Per conversation with Tim, the gross acreage is not a value field, but does pull into reports and having nothing... |
| | | |
| | In the photos and sketch area, the building area is limited to 90 verses 9000 which is what the buildings are named. Due to this it names the building 2116231312050090 (example) verses 211623131205009000 so when you print the profile sheet it doesn't print the building |
| | | |
| | Comments transferred from Parature:
10/9/2006 1:59 PM MDT Provided Info Debbie Larson
I believe this has been resolved - Ko took care of it way back when- I think now the issue with the limited # space is not being able to save a note to a 9000 bldg # so the notes don't follow when you copy a record etc. and pictures aren't printing on the field inspec report after .03 was... |
| | | |
| | We would like to be able to preview before printing the output from the Field Inspection Generator. |
| | | |
| | The notes from a Building Permit are not displayed in FieldWare. Lori requested the ability to see and add notes in FieldWare. |
| | | |
| | Comments transferred from Parature:
10/9/2006 1:32 PM MDT Posted Comment Cindy Stromberger This is for an enhancement that needs to go through Cindy South she is gone at this time I will check with her on the status once she returns |
| | | |
| | Per Pat - have the ablitity to add a business name in the Property Info / Name field for each situs address. |
| | | |
| | Comments transferred from Parature:
10/9/2006 1:14 PM MDT Posted Comment Cindy Stromberger This is for an enhancement that has to go through Cindy South which she is out at this time I will send her an e-mail to get an update on this from her. |
| | | |
| | I agree - it would be very helpful |
| | | |
| | We need access to the following tables:
tblImpsBldgPermits
tblAcctUser
tblAcct
It would sure expedite our work if the tables could be accessed for changes instead of having to contact CCI each time. |
| | | |
| | We agree--also it should have local number which we requested as early as July 2005. |
| | | |
| | | |
| | Janet,
These tables are not managed in anyway by the DOR. As far at the Property Tax Division is concerned, you should have no restrictions on these tables.
If the concern is using the tables directly for data editing, the DOR is definitely listening to the direction CCI is providing regarding this.
I will contact CCI regarding this as well on this issue and see if... |
| | | |
| | Need to have the Reception Number (Book and Page or Document Number)added to the NOV and TaxRoll. The reception number is in a defined field in RW sales tables. We had taxpayers demanding to know what property they were paying taxes for. A deed reference is the best way to define a property. |
| | | |
| | This enhancement would be very useful. |
| | | |
| | We are having a problem with the legal description shuffling itself out of the order it was put into the system. CCI said this needs to be an enhacement request. |
| | | |
| | Would be very handy to be able to filter by NBHD extension as well as nbhd - currently when filtering by NBHD you get all extensions . You can filter by occ code, acct type etc. to narrow it down some but I have nbhds that have extensions based on age of homes and would like to run ratios specific to an age range. |
| | | |
| | Currently the data to map button( in sales ratio for GEOWARE) is only active on Residential Sales Ratio, it would be very beneficial to have this available on Residential Land Sales Ratio and also the Commercial Sales Ratio. If this was available on land sales ratio would be able to group by dollar per which would be a great tool for value setting. Currently we do it with GIS... |
| | | |
| | Would be helpful to be able to select by Adj Year in batch verses year built, if you are trying to move bldgs from one extension or nbhd to another based on age - most of our older homes have an adjusted year so when you select by year built you do not get most of the bldgs that you want |
| | | |
| | In the subdivision module if you have buildings in the parent parcel it brings over the nbhd info into the vacant land records that are created. It would be helpful if this information wasn't transferred over because you then have to go in and delete that information. We have found if there is information there on vacant records it can cause funny results in queries. Also the subdivision... |
| | | |
| | Debbie, Don't you just put in the nbhd followed by the 01 etc. I only get residential when I did this. No spaces just run it all together. |
| | | |
| | A site value over 99,999 does not fully appear in a LEA Model. It is confusing when you are looking at the model and can not see the full site amount. We had a site value of $110,000 and, looking at the model after we created it, the screen only showed $10,000. The data is not affected as the LEA does calculate with the correct $ amount. We submitted a ticket to CCI concerning... |
| | | |
| | Two possibilities:
In user options - add ability to search only active, inactive and exempt.
Add status column in search results |
| | | |
| | In all batch capabilities add Tax ID |
| | | |
| | Abstract: Ability to run local assessed only. Perhaps abstract range like some of other reports offer. |
| | | |
| | Would like to have a new Occ Code for "Modular". We currently have a built-as for Modular and it would be very helpful to have a corresponding Occ Code. |
| | | |
| | I would like to see some effort being made to have more in the way of Wyoming specific reports. I think the fact that we are all expending effort to create similar reports is extremely unproductive. Perhaps the DOR could do some of this... the reports that I have thought of so far are
a Veterans Report to balance
A Field Inspection Sheet
An Abstract that prints the data the SBOE needs in the... |
| | | |
|